CBI Events Calendar

Sep
25
Fri
Online Friday Noon Study Group
Sep 25 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

Friday, September 18,  12-1 

 Our discussion of Finkelstein and Silberman’s The Bible Unearthed continued last week with a focus on the authors’  central claim that the Bible should not be relied upon as an accurate historical document but rather as ”skillfully fashioned” national mythology, an elaborated saga to fit the times reflecting the concerns of the late monarchic period (8th/7th century BCE) and serving the cause of the political unification of a scattered and heterogeneous Israelite population. 

Finkelstein and Silberman seek to demonstrate that the Hebrew Bible and archaeology are frequently incompatible, noting that

  • the Bible records events that took place many centuries after those events took place (e.g. 1750 BCE vs. 700 BCE)   
  • the search for corroborating evidence of the historical patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their families) has been unsuccessful
  • the westward migration from Mesopotamia toward Canaan is ”illusory”
  • there is no record in Egyptian literature of a great mass of fleeing Israelites crossing the border; there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites wandering across the desert 
  • the accounts of the Israelites’ conquest of Canaan (of the walls of Jericho tumbling down) is a “romantic mirage”

In essence our authors argue that the Bible offers a ”classic literary expression of the yearnings and fantasies of a people at a certain time and place.  

While some in our group are accepting of the claims made by Finkelstein and Silberman, others expressed some doubts.  Just because no evidence has yet been unearthed that supports accounts given in the Bible doesn’t mean that the evidence won’t be unearthed at some point in the future.  We noted that the field of archaeology is rife with controversy, and that Finkelstein and Silberman represent one point of view; they may be too quick to approach the Bible with suspicion and skepticism.  While The Bible Unearthed received much praise when it was published, it did have its detractors, such as William Dever who, in the Jerusalem Post, labeled Finkelstein an ”idiosyncratic and doctrinaire archaeologist.”  Dever described The Bible Unearthed as ”an ideological manifesto, not judicious, well-balanced scholarship.”

Our group’s fun will continue on September 18, when we continue with a discussion of chapters 4 and 5 of The Bible Unearthed (pp. 97-145), looking at the Book of Judges and asking ”Who Were the Israelites?” and at the reigns of Kings David and Solomon.  Before we turn to those issues, we’ll return to any loose ends from chapters 2 and 3–the Exodus and the Conquest of Canaan.  As a way of preparing for that discussion, participants might want to check out the following supplemental links:

 

https://wyattmuseum.com/entangled-in-the-land-or-a-way-in-the-deep/2016-11905

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/08/no-really-there-is-a-scientific-explanation-for-the-parting-of-the-red-sea-in-exodus/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Red_Sea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCgmr78Z6tU

https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-the-conquest-of-canaan/

https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/joshua-s-conquest-did-it-happen/

  

Our informal discussion group is held online every Friday from 12-1.  All are welcome to join us, regardless of their level of expertise or attendance at previous noon study group discussions. If you have questions, or would like the Zoom link, please contact Jay Jacoby at  jbjacoby@uncc.edu.

 

Sharing is caring
  • 1
    Share
Sep
26
Sat
Torah Study with Justin Goldstein
Sep 26 @ 10:00 am – 11:00 am

Join Justin Goldstein for an hour of Torah study and discussion of the week’s Torah portion.

All are welcome, link to join the Zoom meeting here.

Sharing is caring
Sep
27
Sun
Kever Avot at Lou Pollock Cemetery @ Lou Pollock Cemetery
Sep 27 @ 11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Kever Avot at Lou Pollock Cemetery @ Lou Pollock Cemetery | Asheville | North Carolina | United States

The ancient custom of Kever Avot, literally “graves of the fathers,” dates almost as far back as Jews themselves. “It’s part of a basic concept in the earliest stratum of Judaism that you to go the grave of the patriarchs in Hebron and they’ll intercede on your behalf,” said Pinchas Giller, American Jewish University professor of medieval Jewish thought. “Even talmudic traditions have the notion of people going to the grave of the patriarchs to ask for things.”

The tradition of visits before the High Holy Days began in the 14th century. More recent Jewish history recounts regular pilgrimages to the burial sites of revered rabbis and loved ones in Sephardic and pre-World War II European Jewish communities on the anniversary of a death, fast days and other times during the year. Visitors showed love and respect for the departed and prayed for the soul’s safe journey to heaven.

Join Rabbi Wolf Alterman for a brief socially-distanced Kever Avot service to remember and honor friends and family we’ve lost during the year. Please remember to wear a mask.

Sharing is caring
Oct
2
Fri
Online Friday Noon Study Group
Oct 2 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

Friday, September 18,  12-1 

 Our discussion of Finkelstein and Silberman’s The Bible Unearthed continued last week with a focus on the authors’  central claim that the Bible should not be relied upon as an accurate historical document but rather as ”skillfully fashioned” national mythology, an elaborated saga to fit the times reflecting the concerns of the late monarchic period (8th/7th century BCE) and serving the cause of the political unification of a scattered and heterogeneous Israelite population. 

Finkelstein and Silberman seek to demonstrate that the Hebrew Bible and archaeology are frequently incompatible, noting that

  • the Bible records events that took place many centuries after those events took place (e.g. 1750 BCE vs. 700 BCE)   
  • the search for corroborating evidence of the historical patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their families) has been unsuccessful
  • the westward migration from Mesopotamia toward Canaan is ”illusory”
  • there is no record in Egyptian literature of a great mass of fleeing Israelites crossing the border; there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites wandering across the desert 
  • the accounts of the Israelites’ conquest of Canaan (of the walls of Jericho tumbling down) is a “romantic mirage”

In essence our authors argue that the Bible offers a ”classic literary expression of the yearnings and fantasies of a people at a certain time and place.  

While some in our group are accepting of the claims made by Finkelstein and Silberman, others expressed some doubts.  Just because no evidence has yet been unearthed that supports accounts given in the Bible doesn’t mean that the evidence won’t be unearthed at some point in the future.  We noted that the field of archaeology is rife with controversy, and that Finkelstein and Silberman represent one point of view; they may be too quick to approach the Bible with suspicion and skepticism.  While The Bible Unearthed received much praise when it was published, it did have its detractors, such as William Dever who, in the Jerusalem Post, labeled Finkelstein an ”idiosyncratic and doctrinaire archaeologist.”  Dever described The Bible Unearthed as ”an ideological manifesto, not judicious, well-balanced scholarship.”

Our group’s fun will continue on September 18, when we continue with a discussion of chapters 4 and 5 of The Bible Unearthed (pp. 97-145), looking at the Book of Judges and asking ”Who Were the Israelites?” and at the reigns of Kings David and Solomon.  Before we turn to those issues, we’ll return to any loose ends from chapters 2 and 3–the Exodus and the Conquest of Canaan.  As a way of preparing for that discussion, participants might want to check out the following supplemental links:

 

https://wyattmuseum.com/entangled-in-the-land-or-a-way-in-the-deep/2016-11905

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/08/no-really-there-is-a-scientific-explanation-for-the-parting-of-the-red-sea-in-exodus/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Red_Sea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCgmr78Z6tU

https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-the-conquest-of-canaan/

https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/joshua-s-conquest-did-it-happen/

  

Our informal discussion group is held online every Friday from 12-1.  All are welcome to join us, regardless of their level of expertise or attendance at previous noon study group discussions. If you have questions, or would like the Zoom link, please contact Jay Jacoby at  jbjacoby@uncc.edu.

 

Sharing is caring
  • 1
    Share
Oct
9
Fri
Online Friday Noon Study Group
Oct 9 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

Friday, September 18,  12-1 

 Our discussion of Finkelstein and Silberman’s The Bible Unearthed continued last week with a focus on the authors’  central claim that the Bible should not be relied upon as an accurate historical document but rather as ”skillfully fashioned” national mythology, an elaborated saga to fit the times reflecting the concerns of the late monarchic period (8th/7th century BCE) and serving the cause of the political unification of a scattered and heterogeneous Israelite population. 

Finkelstein and Silberman seek to demonstrate that the Hebrew Bible and archaeology are frequently incompatible, noting that

  • the Bible records events that took place many centuries after those events took place (e.g. 1750 BCE vs. 700 BCE)   
  • the search for corroborating evidence of the historical patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their families) has been unsuccessful
  • the westward migration from Mesopotamia toward Canaan is ”illusory”
  • there is no record in Egyptian literature of a great mass of fleeing Israelites crossing the border; there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites wandering across the desert 
  • the accounts of the Israelites’ conquest of Canaan (of the walls of Jericho tumbling down) is a “romantic mirage”

In essence our authors argue that the Bible offers a ”classic literary expression of the yearnings and fantasies of a people at a certain time and place.  

While some in our group are accepting of the claims made by Finkelstein and Silberman, others expressed some doubts.  Just because no evidence has yet been unearthed that supports accounts given in the Bible doesn’t mean that the evidence won’t be unearthed at some point in the future.  We noted that the field of archaeology is rife with controversy, and that Finkelstein and Silberman represent one point of view; they may be too quick to approach the Bible with suspicion and skepticism.  While The Bible Unearthed received much praise when it was published, it did have its detractors, such as William Dever who, in the Jerusalem Post, labeled Finkelstein an ”idiosyncratic and doctrinaire archaeologist.”  Dever described The Bible Unearthed as ”an ideological manifesto, not judicious, well-balanced scholarship.”

Our group’s fun will continue on September 18, when we continue with a discussion of chapters 4 and 5 of The Bible Unearthed (pp. 97-145), looking at the Book of Judges and asking ”Who Were the Israelites?” and at the reigns of Kings David and Solomon.  Before we turn to those issues, we’ll return to any loose ends from chapters 2 and 3–the Exodus and the Conquest of Canaan.  As a way of preparing for that discussion, participants might want to check out the following supplemental links:

 

https://wyattmuseum.com/entangled-in-the-land-or-a-way-in-the-deep/2016-11905

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/08/no-really-there-is-a-scientific-explanation-for-the-parting-of-the-red-sea-in-exodus/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Red_Sea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCgmr78Z6tU

https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-the-conquest-of-canaan/

https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/joshua-s-conquest-did-it-happen/

  

Our informal discussion group is held online every Friday from 12-1.  All are welcome to join us, regardless of their level of expertise or attendance at previous noon study group discussions. If you have questions, or would like the Zoom link, please contact Jay Jacoby at  jbjacoby@uncc.edu.

 

Sharing is caring
  • 1
    Share
Oct
10
Sat
Torah Study with Justin Goldstein
Oct 10 @ 10:00 am – 11:00 am

Join Justin Goldstein for an hour of Torah study and discussion of the week’s Torah portion.

All are welcome, link to join the Zoom meeting here.

Sharing is caring
Oct
16
Fri
Online Friday Noon Study Group
Oct 16 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm

Friday, September 18,  12-1 

 Our discussion of Finkelstein and Silberman’s The Bible Unearthed continued last week with a focus on the authors’  central claim that the Bible should not be relied upon as an accurate historical document but rather as ”skillfully fashioned” national mythology, an elaborated saga to fit the times reflecting the concerns of the late monarchic period (8th/7th century BCE) and serving the cause of the political unification of a scattered and heterogeneous Israelite population. 

Finkelstein and Silberman seek to demonstrate that the Hebrew Bible and archaeology are frequently incompatible, noting that

  • the Bible records events that took place many centuries after those events took place (e.g. 1750 BCE vs. 700 BCE)   
  • the search for corroborating evidence of the historical patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their families) has been unsuccessful
  • the westward migration from Mesopotamia toward Canaan is ”illusory”
  • there is no record in Egyptian literature of a great mass of fleeing Israelites crossing the border; there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites wandering across the desert 
  • the accounts of the Israelites’ conquest of Canaan (of the walls of Jericho tumbling down) is a “romantic mirage”

In essence our authors argue that the Bible offers a ”classic literary expression of the yearnings and fantasies of a people at a certain time and place.  

While some in our group are accepting of the claims made by Finkelstein and Silberman, others expressed some doubts.  Just because no evidence has yet been unearthed that supports accounts given in the Bible doesn’t mean that the evidence won’t be unearthed at some point in the future.  We noted that the field of archaeology is rife with controversy, and that Finkelstein and Silberman represent one point of view; they may be too quick to approach the Bible with suspicion and skepticism.  While The Bible Unearthed received much praise when it was published, it did have its detractors, such as William Dever who, in the Jerusalem Post, labeled Finkelstein an ”idiosyncratic and doctrinaire archaeologist.”  Dever described The Bible Unearthed as ”an ideological manifesto, not judicious, well-balanced scholarship.”

Our group’s fun will continue on September 18, when we continue with a discussion of chapters 4 and 5 of The Bible Unearthed (pp. 97-145), looking at the Book of Judges and asking ”Who Were the Israelites?” and at the reigns of Kings David and Solomon.  Before we turn to those issues, we’ll return to any loose ends from chapters 2 and 3–the Exodus and the Conquest of Canaan.  As a way of preparing for that discussion, participants might want to check out the following supplemental links:

 

https://wyattmuseum.com/entangled-in-the-land-or-a-way-in-the-deep/2016-11905

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/08/no-really-there-is-a-scientific-explanation-for-the-parting-of-the-red-sea-in-exodus/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Red_Sea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCgmr78Z6tU

https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-the-conquest-of-canaan/

https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/joshua-s-conquest-did-it-happen/

  

Our informal discussion group is held online every Friday from 12-1.  All are welcome to join us, regardless of their level of expertise or attendance at previous noon study group discussions. If you have questions, or would like the Zoom link, please contact Jay Jacoby at  jbjacoby@uncc.edu.

 

Sharing is caring
  • 1
    Share